News

We provide the latest news
from the world of economics and finance

23 April
Philip Morris (PM) Q1 Earnings: How Key Metrics Compare to Wall Street Estimates

For the quarter ended March 2024, Philip Morris (PM) reported revenue of $8.79 billion, up 8.6% over the same period last year. EPS came in at $1.50, compared to $1.38 in the year-ago quarter.

The reported revenue compares to the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $8.44 billion, representing a surprise of +4.14%. The company delivered an EPS surprise of +6.38%, with the consensus EPS estimate being $1.41.

While investors closely watch year-over-year changes in headline numbers -- revenue and earnings -- and how they compare to Wall Street expectations to determine their next course of action, some key metrics always provide a better insight into a company's underlying performance.

Since these metrics play a crucial role in driving the top- and bottom-line numbers, comparing them with the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated about them helps investors better project a stock's price performance.

Here is how Philip Morris performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts:

  • Shipment Volume - PMI Cigarettes and HTUs - Heated Tobacco Units: 33.13 billion versus the three-analyst average estimate of 31.79 billion.
  • Shipment Volume - Europe - Cigarette: 37.09 billion versus the two-analyst average estimate of 37.96 billion.
  • Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Units Volume - Europe: 48.43 billion versus 50.77 billion estimated by two analysts on average.
  • Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Units Volume - Americas: 14.46 billion compared to the 14.82 billion average estimate based on two analysts.
  • Net Revenues by Geography- EA, AU & PMI DF: $1.68 billion versus $1.49 billion estimated by three analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +10.8% change.
  • Net Revenues by Geography- Europe: $3.37 billion versus $3.35 billion estimated by three analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +15.6% change.
  • Net Revenues by Geography- SSEA, CIS & MEA: $2.66 billion compared to the $2.51 billion average estimate based on three analysts.
  • Net Revenues- Smoke-Free Excl. W&H- Europe: $1.43 billion versus the two-analyst average estimate of $1.38 billion. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +31%.
  • Net Revenues- Smoke-Free Excl. W&H- SSEA, CIS & MEA: $312 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $375.23 million.
  • Net Revenues- Wellness and Healthcare: $90 million versus the three-analyst average estimate of $84 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +4.7%.
  • Net Revenues- Total combustible Tobacco: $5.41 billion versus $5.29 billion estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +3.5% change.
  • Net Revenues- Total Smoke-free excl. W&H: $3.30 billion versus the two-analyst average estimate of $3.13 billion. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +21.6%.

View all Key Company Metrics for Philip Morris here>>>

Shares of Philip Morris have returned +3.2% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's -4.2% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term.

Top 5 Dividend Stocks for Your Retirement

Zacks targets 5 well-established companies with solid fundamentals and a history of raising dividends. More importantly, they have the resources and will to likely pay them in the future.

Click now for a Special Report packed with unconventional wisdom and insights you simply won’t get from your neighborhood financial planner.

See our Top 5 now – the report is FREE >>

Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report

To read this article on Zacks.com click here.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.