News

Among the underlying components of the Russell 3000 index, we saw noteworthy options trading volume today in Walt Disney Co. (Symbol: DIS), where a total of 58,559 contracts have traded so far, representing approximately 5.9 million underlying shares. That amounts to about 58.2% of DIS's average daily trading volume over the past month of 10.1 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $102 strike call option expiring June 07, 2024, with 5,196 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 519,600 underlying shares of DIS. Below is a chart showing DIS's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $102 strike highlighted in orange:

International Business Machines Corp (Symbol: IBM) options are showing a volume of 19,322 contracts thus far today. That number of contracts represents approximately 1.9 million underlying shares, working out to a sizeable 57.6% of IBM's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 3.4 million shares. Particularly high volume was seen for the $170 strike call option expiring June 07, 2024, with 2,592 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 259,200 underlying shares of IBM. Below is a chart showing IBM's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $170 strike highlighted in orange:

And Avis Budget Group Inc (Symbol: CAR) saw options trading volume of 2,997 contracts, representing approximately 299,700 underlying shares or approximately 57% of CAR's average daily trading volume over the past month, of 526,215 shares. Especially high volume was seen for the $98 strike put option expiring June 14, 2024, with 401 contracts trading so far today, representing approximately 40,100 underlying shares of CAR. Below is a chart showing CAR's trailing twelve month trading history, with the $98 strike highlighted in orange:

For the various different available expirations for DIS options, IBM options, or CAR options, visit StockOptionsChannel.com.

Also see:

Split History
CDE Insider Buying
SPXC Stock Predictions

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.