News

Looking today at week-over-week shares outstanding changes among the universe of ETFs covered at ETF Channel, one standout is the Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (Symbol: SPMO) where we have detected an approximate $223.0 million dollar inflow -- that's a 1.6% increase week over week in outstanding units (from 114,330,000 to 116,120,000). Among the largest underlying components of SPMO, in trading today Cisco Systems Inc (Symbol: CSCO) is off about 0.9%, Newmont Corp (Symbol: NEM) is up about 2.4%, and McKesson Corp (Symbol: MCK) is up by about 0.7%. For a complete list of holdings, visit the SPMO Holdings page » The chart below shows the one year price performance of SPMO, versus its 200 day moving average:

Looking at the chart above, SPMO's low point in its 52 week range is $84.86 per share, with $125.5399 as the 52 week high point — that compares with a last trade of $125.28. Comparing the most recent share price to the 200 day moving average can also be a useful technical analysis technique -- learn more about the 200 day moving average ».

Project your dividend income with confidence: Income Calendar tracks your income portfolio like a personal assistant.

Exchange traded funds (ETFs) trade just like stocks, but instead of ''shares'' investors are actually buying and selling ''units''. These ''units'' can be traded back and forth just like stocks, but can also be created or destroyed to accommodate investor demand. Each week we monitor the week-over-week change in shares outstanding data, to keep a lookout for those ETFs experiencing notable inflows (many new units created) or outflows (many old units destroyed). Creation of new units will mean the underlying holdings of the ETF need to be purchased, while destruction of units involves selling underlying holdings, so large flows can also impact the individual components held within ETFs.

Also see:

Auto Dealerships Dividend Stocks
CSSEP Historical Stock Prices
Energy Stocks Hedge Funds Are Selling

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.